The view seems to be that in public life we are essentially identical and must be treated the same. No business may refuse to serve us. And since government must serve all equally, private groups supported by government also must serve everyone equally.
But this public conformity concept of the common good is unsustainable. It is a new secular theocracy. Against it there is a strong commandment. The commandment is the First Amendment of the Constitution, which protects religion from government imposition—protects not only religious belief but also religious exercise. It protects doctors whose conscience forbids certain procedures and it protects religious charities when they insist that only applicants who share their convictions can join their staffs.
When government honors religious exercise in this way, some citizens will have to go to another doctor’s office instead of this one, and some citizens will find they cannot get jobs with some nonprofits. Not being welcomed everywhere seems an intolerable imposition to the proponents of uniformity. But it is the real consequence of protecting religious freedom. There would be no need for the constitutional protection if religious freedom did not sometimes require some people to give way.
We must face the reality. America is home to several moral communities. The government should not be used to enforce a single code of behavior that denies the deep religious convictions of many people and institutions of faith. The common good that the government must foster and protect is not homogeneous but includes diverse contributions from a diverse civil society. The common good is comprised of multiple colors. (link)
It’s about the U.S., but I think it applies here, too.