Look like a slightly stronger Conservative minority government on the way. I’m OK with that.
But I’m looking once again at the popular vote statistics and the numbers are out of whack. I know I do this every election, but bear with me.
Currently a party wins seats in the house of commons based on the number of ridings won by its candidates, regardless of relative populations of those ridings.
So, hypothetical worst-case scenario: there are 3 ridings in Saskanada, Riding 1 has a population of 100,000; Riding 2 has a population of 10,000; and Riding 3 has a population of 5,000. The Marc Party could form Saskanada’s government by getting 51% of the vote in Ridings 2 and 3, even if the Dixie party won 100% of the popular vote in Riding 1. It’s more nuanced than that, I’m sure, but that’s the problem in an nutshell.
The problem is strongly evident in the division of seats between the Bloc Quebecois (which really only represents the interests of Quebec and not the nation’s and runs only in Quebec) and the Green Party (which runs nationwide). The Bloc won (or is currently at) 10% of the popular vote. The Green Party is very close to the Bloc with 7% of the popular vote.
BUT…because of our electoral system, the Bloc has won 50 seats in the House of Commons and the Green Party has not won a single seat . In other words, a 3% difference in popular vote but a 5000%+ difference in number of seats won (of course, you can’t really calculate a percentage difference between 0 and 50).
This is why I’m for electoral reform.